Science Teaching Journal Club

Each week the journal club reads, discusses, and considers how to implement ideas from an article or book that explores issues relevant to teaching and learning in college science classrooms. We invite participants from all ranks and disciplines to join us for these sessions, which we use to model evidence-based teaching practices. The Science Teaching Journal Club originated as a partnership of the Science Literacy Program and the Teaching Engagement Program. 

Thursdays at 9 a.m.
In person: LISB 217 OR Zoom (https://uoregon.zoom.us/j/369256082)

Questions? Please contact Julie Mueller (jmueller@uoregon.edu)

Join the STEM Teaching Mailing List

 

Fall 2026 Journal Club Readings

Join the journal club this fall as we focus on two areas made more urgent by the increasing capabilities of Gen AI and the temptation students face to use it in ways unsupportive of learning. 

First: Assessment in the age of AI. In most courses, it’s important to assess students’ own knowledge and skills independent of AI. We’ll explore some assessment strategies that also reduce the possibility of AI misuse during the assessment. We’ll also read about some AI tools and capabilities faculty should be aware of as they plan their assessments as well as tools available at UO to streamline the assessment process and encourage academic integrity.

Second: Facilitating effective group work. In-class group work is becoming more common as faculty move more work into the classroom in an effort to reduce student reliance on AI when completing assignments. We will look into methods for facilitating the group work experience to maximize student learning.

Please contact Julie Mueller if you have trouble accessing the materials.

 

Tentative Schedule:

WeekReading
Week One (10/1)Callaghan, K., Kestin, G., Klales, A., McCarty, L., & Deslauriers, L. (2026). Active learning through flexible collaborative exams: Improving assessments across disciplines. Active Learning in Higher Education, 27(3), 349-365. https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874251344293
Week Two (10/8)Hansel, C. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Quick, J. D., Greene, A. H., & Ricci, M. (2024). Gradescope in Large Lecture Classrooms: A Case Study at Indiana University: How an online grading platform enhanced student learning and instructor feedback in large-scale courses. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.14434/jotlt.v13i1.38519
Week Three (10/15)Barba, L. A., & Stegner, L. (2026). The Conversational Exam: A Scalable Assessment Design for the AI Era. Computer, 59(6), 132-139. https://arxiv.org/html/2601.10691v1
Week Four (10/22)Winstone, N. E., Gravett, K., & Elkington, S. (2026). Black Box Assessment: rethinking integrity and learning for a time of Generative AI. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2026.2661365
Week Five (10/29)Corbin, T., Sharpe, S., & Dawson, P. (2026). On AI glasses and wearable AI in assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2026.2661367
Week Six (11/5)De Jesus, M. M., Hobbs, K. S., Adams, P. E., Ammamoo, E., Costello, R. A., Cotner, S., ... & Ewell, S. N. (2026). Equitable Group Work in Undergraduate Biology Courses: Leveraging a Complex Instruction Framework to Identify Pedagogical Strategies. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 25(2), es1. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.25-07-0154
Week Seven (11/12)Bertram, A., Nortcliffe, A. (2026). From Group Work to Teamwork: Preparing Chemistry Undergraduates for Collaborative Laboratory Practice. J. Chem. Educ. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6c00742
Week Eight (11/19)Salvatore, S., White, C., & Podowitz-Thomas, S. (2024). “Not a cookie cutter situation”: how neurodivergent students experience group work in their STEM courses. International Journal of STEM Education, 11(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00508-0
Week Nine (11/26)Thanksgiving break - No journal club
Week Ten (12/3)Bennoun, S., Yan, V.X. & Xu, A. (2026). Mixing problems increases performance of all students but especially of low-achieving ones in college calculus. npj Sci. Learn. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-026-00450-6